<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Bet Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.leeromero.org/2010/02/22/best-bet-governance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.leeromero.org/2010/02/22/best-bet-governance/</link>
	<description>On Content, Collaboration and Findability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:15:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Robey</title>
		<link>http://blog.leeromero.org/2010/02/22/best-bet-governance/comment-page-1/#comment-20634</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leeromero.org/?p=392#comment-20634</guid>
		<description>I really enjoy reading your posts, but I&#039;ve got a question for you about your best bet governance.  Do you make any differentiation between generic and specific terms when you make your maximum limit of five targets per term?  By generic terms I mean words like &quot;guide&quot;, &quot;policy&quot;, &quot;help&quot; etc. which are frequently used on their own, but can also be qualified with an extra term to create a phrase.  For instance &quot;IT guide&quot;, &quot;IT policy&quot; and &quot;IT help&quot;.  By identifying the term at the level of a phrase you can include these generic terms, but this could also possibly be a loophole through which the governance process could be bypassed.  I do agree with you that best bets are useful and your governance model looks like a really great start, but I&#039;d be interested in hearing your thoughts about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoy reading your posts, but I&#8217;ve got a question for you about your best bet governance.  Do you make any differentiation between generic and specific terms when you make your maximum limit of five targets per term?  By generic terms I mean words like &#8220;guide&#8221;, &#8220;policy&#8221;, &#8220;help&#8221; etc. which are frequently used on their own, but can also be qualified with an extra term to create a phrase.  For instance &#8220;IT guide&#8221;, &#8220;IT policy&#8221; and &#8220;IT help&#8221;.  By identifying the term at the level of a phrase you can include these generic terms, but this could also possibly be a loophole through which the governance process could be bypassed.  I do agree with you that best bets are useful and your governance model looks like a really great start, but I&#8217;d be interested in hearing your thoughts about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

